Tuesday, June 2, 2015

Texas To Execute One Of Its Oldest Death Row Inmates Amid Innocence Claims

Lester Bower, who has maintained his innocence in the 1983 murders of four men, is set to be executed on June 3 after spending more than 30 years on death row.

Lester Bower

Michael Graczyk / AP

Texas's oldest and second-longest serving death row inmate since the death penalty was reinstated in 1976 is set to be executed on Wednesday.

Lester Bower, 67, was convicted of the the 1983 murders of four men during the theft of an ultralight aircraft from a Dallas airplane hangar. He has has maintained his innocence in the murders of Jerry Brown, Bob Tate, Philip Good and Ronald Mayes; the latter two were law enforcement officers.

Bower has been on death row for more than 30 years and has faced seven execution dates.

Bower was convicted of killing Tate in order to steal an ultralight aircraft he had advertised to sell for $4,500. He then killed the other three men, execution style, when they unexpectedly showed up at the ranch hangar, according to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ).

His attorneys have filed a last minute appeal with the Supreme Court to stop his execution. In March, the Supreme Court declined to review Bower's death sentence, which was handed down 30 years ago under older guidelines by which the jury deciding Bower's fate did not get the opportunity to consider potentially mitigating evidence — evidence that could lead to a lesser punishment.

This was something the Supreme Court later declared unconstitutional. In Bower's case, the mitigating evidence included testimony of his good character from friends and family.

His attorneys have argued that there are six witnesses who say that the murders were not committed by Bower, but by other individuals as a part of a drug deal gone wrong.

An unnamed witness signed an affidavit in 1989, saying that her ex-boyfriend, Lynn Langford, and three other men committed the murders after a drug deal went awry. She said she heard her ex-boyfriend and the others discuss the killings when they were drunk and that Langford was unable to sleep for weeks after that.

Her story was corroborated by other witnesses, including the wife of one of the other three men who discussed the murders with Langford. One of the men, Ches, also admitted to owning a .22 pistol with Fiocchi bullets which were used to kill the men, the Intercept reported.

The Fiocchi ammunition used in the murders was at the center of the state's case against Bower, and his attorneys have argued that prosecutors misrepresented important facts and withheld crucial evidence about the ammunition.

During the trial, the state had argued that the Fiocchi ammunition, found in Bower's possession, was so unique and rare that only 12 to 15 people in Texas had bought or owned it. Following multiple Freedom of Information Act requests by Bower's lawyers, the state released records that showed it was aware that the ammunition was used by hundreds of people and was not as rare or unique as prosecutors had presented.

Defense attorneys also said that Bower's execution will amount to cruel and unusual punishment after he has spent more than 30 years on death row, including more than 14 years in solitary confinement.

"Courts have left him languishing for years at a stretch while requests for relief have been pending," his lawyers said in appeals. "Mr. Bower has been on death row since 1984, and for this entire 30-year span, there have been only 132 days in which Mr. Bower has not had legitimate, meritorious legal claims pending before some court. And all the while, Mr. Bower has been isolated from his friends and family—often in routine administrative segregation—and under the constant mental burden of possible execution."

The state has argued that any delay in Bower's execution is "purely of his own doing" owing to his relentless litigation raising "meritless claims" over 30 years and "unnecessarily delaying justice for the four families of the men that Bower slaughtered in cold blood." The state said that every court has disagreed with Bower's "fanciful theories" about his innocence.

tdcj.state.tx.us

In 1983, Bower, then 35, lived with his wife, Shari, and their two daughters in the Arlington suburb of Dallas. He worked as a chemical salesman and was an avid bow hunter, white water rafter and a licensed firearms dealer.

On Oct. 3, 1983, Bower visited a B&B ranch owned by one of the victims, Bob Tate, a 51-year-old building contractor. Tate also owned an ultralight aircraft that was advertised to sell for $4,500. Bower and Tate agreed that Bower would pay $3,000 in cash and an additional $1,500 later on the condition that he left his business card with a $1,500 IOU written at the back.

From this point on, Bower's version of what happened differs from the state's.

Bower said the four men helped him disassemble the craft which he loaded on to his vehicle and returned home.

Later that day, authorities found the body of Mayes, a 39-year-old former police officer, at the door of the hangar. The bodies of Tate; 29-year-old sheriff's deputy Philip Good; and 52-year-old interior designer Jerry Brown were under a pile of carpeting in the hangar.

Good, Tate and Brown had been shot twice in the head, and Mayes had been shot in the head, neck, right arm and chest, according to court documents. Tate's ultralight was also missing.

Bower said he learned of the murders the next day but did not come forward about his presence at the hangar as his wife had forbidden him to buy the ultralight and he did not want her to know about it. He also denied his involvement with Tate and the ultralight when questioned by the FBI. In later interviews, Bower said he initially lied to protect his family and to save himself from embarrassment after lying to his wife about the ultralight.

After his arrest, Bower told his wife's pastor about meeting the victims at the hangar and prepared a handwritten account of his version of events. Authorities did not find the murder weapon, a .22 Ruger pistol, or Bower's fingerprints at the scene of the crime. There were no witnesses either.

On the state's side, Texas has maintained there was ample evidence linking Bower to the murders. He possessed the .22 caliber ammunition used in the murders and two ultralight tires, with the victim's name on them. Other ultralight parts were recovered from his house. Unidentified blood stains were also found on a pair of his boots and a travel bag.

Bower practiced firing the .22 caliber gun at a shooting range days before the murder and "offered a plainly incredible story" about losing the pistol while camping due to an attack of kidney stones, according to the state. Bower was also in possession of the Fiocchi bullets, the shell casings of which were found at the crime scene. He also lied to investigators about his involvement with the victims, the state said.

"I blame myself mightily for the position I'm in," Bower said in a recent interview with the Star-Telegram. "The minute you start bucking the system, you immediately go from a person of interest to a prime suspect." He said that while he didn't blame the prosecutors then, he wished they would have the chance to consider other evidence now.

He told the Star-Telegram that he is not afraid of death any more. "If they kill me two weeks from now, my last words will probably be 'I'm out of here.' What can possibly be worse than this?"


View Entire List ›



from BuzzFeed - USNews http://ift.tt/1M29Veq

ACLU Calls Baltimore Jail "A Crumbling Victorian Dungeon"

The ACLU is asking a court to reopen a lawsuit over conditions at the “crumbling” and “vermin-infested” Baltimore city jail.

A mattress from the Baltimore City Detention Center.

ACLU

Despite nearly half a century of litigation, the Baltimore city jail remains a "crumbling, filthy, and vermin-infested infrastructure" with conditions that may have resulted in the deaths of at least seven detainees over the past two and a half years, civil rights advocates argue in a motion filed today in federal court in Maryland.

Several civil rights organizations say the jail's conditions violate a prior legal settlement with the federal government forcing the state to improve conditions at the jail, and they are asking to reopen a long-running lawsuit over poor medical treatment and unsafe conditions at the facility.

Calling the Baltimore City Detention Center a "violent" and "dank and dangerous place," the 100-page motion lists a number of ways the state failed to comply with the agreement, ranging from not providing status reports on compliance efforts to failure to provide insulin and HIV antiretroviral medications for inmates who need them. The motion argues that "the promises of government officials are still unfulfilled, and only court intervention will put an end to the endless cycle of new promises followed by failure to honor those promises." Tuesday was the court's final deadline for keeping the case open.

"In 20 years of prison litigation, it is easily one of the worst place I've ever seen," David Fathi, director of the American Civil Liberties Union's National Prison Project, told BuzzFeed News this morning. "It is a crumbling Victorian dungeon."

Today, Baltimore's only jail — which is run by the state — holds around 2,500 people, about 80% of them black. "This jail, like most jails, houses people who are pretrial detainees who and are presumed to be innocent," Fathi said. "In those cases, if they had money to post bail, they wouldn't be in jail at all."

Tuesday's motion is just the latest chapter in a long-running legal battle over conditions in Baltimore's jails that began with a federal lawsuit in 1971 to challenge the detainees' conditions of confinement. Now known as Duvall et al. v. O'Malley et al, the original 1971 case was consolidated with a 1976 lawsuit over overcrowding at the jail. In 1993, the matter was resolved by a consent decree, a way of resolving the case in which parties resolve a dispute in a publicly filed agreement over which the court maintains jurisdiction. That decree was put on hold in 1999 after Congress passed the Prison Litigation Reform Act, which allowed states to end litigation if the original constitutional violations identified by the lawsuits had been corrected.

The ACLU grew concerned again with conditions at the detention center in 2002, when it asked for and received a temporary restraining order regarding excessive heat at the city's Women's Detention Center. A Department of Justice report that year also pointed out health and safety violations at the jail. In 2003, the detainees' lawyers moved to reopen the consent decree.

Maryland settled the suit in 2009. "Basically, most of the things that are discussed in the settlement [have] already been underway and been improving through working together with the Department of Justice over the last five to six years," a spokesperson with the state's Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services told the Daily Record in 2009.

The motion comes on the heels of a number of complaints about the jail in the wake of protests over the death of Freddie Gray, an unarmed 25-year-old black man who died while in custody of Baltimore police. An 18-year-old Baltimore college student who was arrested during demonstrations in April told BuzzFeed News that detainees were packed into cells, mocked, and held in terrible conditions.

A Baltimore public defender later wrote that "the holding cells are approximately 10 by 10 (some slightly larger), with one open sink and toilet. The women were instructed that the water was "bad" and that they shouldn't drink it. There are no beds — just a concrete cube. No blankets or pillows. The cells were designed to hold people for a few hours, not a few days. In the one cell which housed 15 women, there wasn't even enough room for them all to lie down at the same time."

However, Fathi said today's motion is unrelated to those recent developments.

"We've been concerned for many months about the state's persistent noncompliance and certainly well before recent events in Baltimore," he said.



from BuzzFeed - USNews http://ift.tt/1JhTgWB

Monday, June 1, 2015

TSA Adminstrator Reassigned Following Report Of Sweeping Security Failures

A TSA investigation found undercover investigators were able to smuggle weapons through security checkpoints 95% of the time, ABC News reported. The acting administrator of the TSA was reassigned Monday night.

David McNew / Getty Images

The leader of the Transportation Security Administration was reassigned Monday following revelations that security checkpoints failed to detect 95% of weapons and banned items during undercover tests.

ABC News first reported the security failures on Monday, following a series of tests by undercover members of the Department of Homeland Security. In 67 of the 70 tests, the TSA failed to detect potential weapons, ABC News reported.

Following ABC's report, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson announced a shakeup in the TSA leadership "effective immediately."

According to a statement, Acting Administrator Melvin Carraway would be reassigned to another office within Homeland Security. Deputy Acting Administrator Mark Hatfield will lead the TSA until a new acting administrator is appointed, Johnson said.

Carraway had been with the TSA for 11 years.

Johnson also urged the Senate to quickly confirm the current nominee to lead the TSA on a permanent basis — Coast Guard Vice Admiral Pete Neffenger, who was nominated in April by President Obama.

Earlier on Monday, Johnson said that covert testing of TSA security measures would continue. He added that training would specifically address the recent findings.

"The numbers in these reports never look good out of context, but they are a critical element in the continual evolution of our aviation security," Johnson said in a statement. "We take these findings very seriously in our continued effort to test, measure and enhance our capabilities and techniques as threats evolve."



from BuzzFeed - USNews http://ift.tt/1Ql7WTY

James Holmes: Killing Colorado Theater-Goers Increased My Own Value

ABC 7 / Via thedenverchannel.com

Pressed by a court-appointed psychiatrist to explain his reasons for killing 12 people at an Aurora, Colorado, movie theater, James Holmes described increased his own value by "one unit" for each fatality.

"As a human being, they have this value, and I can take that value," Holmes said in a recorded interview that was played in court Monday.

For a second week, the trial of Holmes focused on recorded interviews with a court-appointed psychiatrist that took place in 2014, two years after the shooting massacre. Holmes has pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity to 12 counts of murder and 70 counts of attempted murder. William Reid, one of several psychiatrists expected to testify, has said he believes Holmes was legally sane at the time of the shooting.

In the recording played Monday, Holmes describes how after taking 12 lives, he is now worth 13. A normal person would be worth 1, he explained.

"What does that feel like?" Reid asked.

"Just that I feel better than before," Holmes said.

On the witness stand Monday, Reid said Holmes' explanations could be interpreted as a belief of a person with little mental illness, or the delusion of a person who was more severely mentally ill. Either way, he said, Holmes was capable of understanding what he was doing.

"He did what was necessary to get the points," Reid said. "He was still aware that he was trading people's lives and injuries in order to feel better."

POOL New / Reuters

Reid added that it is common for severely mentally ill people to describe being controlled by an external force, which can be a factor in determining if they are capable of being held responsible for a crime.

"In this case, he continuously denied to me there was any external force – wasn’t God, wasn’t Satan, or an external power, it was him," Reid said.

Holmes also described how he began to see shadows while he was in graduate school. They would start with a flicker out of the corner of his eye, he said, then they would appear in the center of his vision, fighting each other with axes or guns.

At the same time, he said he was becoming increasingly depressed.

"The shootings were supposed to increase my self-worth so that would get me out of the depression in the end," Holmes said.

Watch Monday's court proceedings here.

youtube.com


LINK: Here’s What James Holmes Wrote In His Notebook Before The Aurora Theater Shooting


LINK: James Holmes Targeted Theater Because “There’d Be A Lot Of People There”



from BuzzFeed - USNews http://ift.tt/1eMc7N0

Someone Impersonated Me To Trick A Sexual Assault Victim

Here’s how I found out and what I still don’t know. I asked notorious troll Chuck Johnson if he had any ideas.

Emma Sulkowicz in September.

Andrew Burton / Getty Images

When she decided to write the story of her sexual assault, the woman who goes by "Josie" said she "went into it with the expectation that someone would find out who I was."

The piece, published by Jezebel on May 21, explained the role she played in the Columbia University allegations against student Paul Nungesser — what happened during the adjudication process, in which Nungesser was initially found guilty but later won an appeal, and why she's only "begrudgingly given anonymous interviews." She described taking a different path from "Carry That Weight" artist Emma Sulkowicz, who's been the focus of national media coverage since September, when she began carrying a mattress around campus until Nungesser was expelled or left Columbia. The performance piece ended when Sulkowicz and Nungesser graduated two weeks ago — around the time Josie decided to write publicly about Nungesser for the first time.

"I wrote this essay, and I sort of braced myself," Josie said. "And nothing happened."

Two days later, the name of "Adam" — another anonymous student who filed a sexual assault complaint against Nungesser at Columbia — was published by Charles C. Johnson, a self-identified journalist and "nerd researcher" who uses racist and misogynist language to bring attention to his work and his website GotNews.com. (Johnson was recently suspended from Twitter, where he had more than 25,000 followers, for asking for donations to "take out" activist DeRay McKesson.) It wasn't the first time Johnson has published the name of an anonymous alleged victim of sexual assault. Josie feared she would be next.

"I know who Chuck Johnson is," Josie said. "And I knew if anyone was going to publish my name, it was probably going to to be him."

The following Monday was Memorial Day, and Josie was spending time with her boyfriend's family — stressed about being Johnson's next "doxx," but trying not to think about it too much. Then, in the late afternoon, she checked her work email. She had a message that was sent around 1:30 in the morning, from me, Jessica Testa, a reporter at BuzzFeed. The email said I was reaching out to Josie "because we're interested in republishing your powerful anonymous article at BuzzFeed but I just want to be sure we have your permission."

Josie — a media-savvy writer, who once "updogged" writer Cathy Young — was pissed. She didn't know how I got her name or email address, and she said she felt "betrayed." She was mad at the Jezebel writer she thought might have given it to me. She was mad at me for the "weird" request, which should have gone through Jezebel — not her directly.

The only thing is: I didn't email her.

Jessica Testa / Via BuzzFeed News

I found out that someone emailed Josie with my name only after Erin Gloria Ryan, the Jezebel editor who published Josie's story, contacted me. I learned from Ryan that the email to Josie came from "jtes1984@gmail.com," an address incorporating my Twitter handle — but certainly didn't belong to me. Until that Monday night, I didn't know Josie's real name.

After reading the email, Josie — still thinking it was me — had replied right away: "How did you get my name?" That was at 6:41 p.m. on Monday. Seven hours later, there was a story on GotNews' website identifying her by name. When he published her name, Johnson said GotNews.com had obtained Josie's identity "thanks to some high level sleuthing and the contributions of ." (The sentence doesn't end.)

It turned out the anticipation of having her anonymity stripped away was worse than it actually being stripped away. (Still, Josie has asked to remain anonymous. She knows her name is out there, but she doesn't want to make it any easier for people to find it.)

She found Johnson's post about her "pathetic" — her name was spelled wrong and she was misidentified in a photo. More importantly, she said, "he didn't have an angle. His angle was like, 'Oh this person wanted to be anonymous. Well she's not anymore. It wasn't like, 'Oh she has a history of this.' Or like, 'This is suspicious.' It was like: 'Here's a person.'"

Later, I asked Josie about her reaction to finding out the email wasn't from me, separate from what happened later that night.

"My stomach dropped, and I was like, 'Oh shit, it's Chuck Johnson, It's someone trying to doxx me and figure out who I am," Josie said. "It's disgusting to try to take advantage of someone who's in a vulnerable position."

Two days before she got the email — before he was suspended — Johnson tweeted: "Everyone has an unguarded moment. Find it & control the world."

I had emailed Johnson five days before Josie was contacted by someone claiming to be me. I was looking to report out who was responsible for the posters hanging around Columbia of Emma Sulkowicz with the words "Pretty Little Liar." There was speculation that Johnson was involved, so I asked him if he had anything to do with the posters or their complementary Twitter account @fakerape. (Johnson has also registered the domain fakeraperegistry.com.)

"I thought we were clear," Johnson replied. "I don't answer inquiries from a cat pornography site that doxxed an innocent man for exercising his constitutional rights." (He was referring to a BuzzFeed story from last fall that reported a member of the fraternity at the heart of the Rolling Stone University of Virginia story had hired a lawyer known for representing college men accused of rape.)

"Good luck on your witch hunt," he wrote. "I wish you nothing but failure."

I called Johnson on Monday, about a week after learning about the email sent to Josie. He hung up on me as soon as I explained why I was calling. Then he texted me: "As a rule I don't participated in any interviews with BuzzFeed. Cat pornographers aren't journalists." Over text message, I asked him three more times if he impersonated me using the address jtes1984@gmail.com. As before, Johnson didn't take the opportunity to deny he impersonated me using that email address. He restated his refusal to answer the question. I emailed him again to let him know this story was about to be published.

"Once again I do not answer inquiries from BuzzFeed," he replied. "I would be very careful if you accuse me of committing a crime with the lack of evidence you've presented here."

Again he did not deny the impersonation.


View Entire List ›



from BuzzFeed - USNews http://ift.tt/1AJWn6L

This Terrifying Fog Bank Makes It Look Like A Tsunami Is About To Hit New Jersey

Whoa.

Lifeguards in Sea Girt, New Jersey, posted a seemingly terrifying photo to their social media accounts on Monday.

Lifeguards in Sea Girt, New Jersey, posted a seemingly terrifying photo to their social media accounts on Monday.

Facebook: SeaGirtBoroGovernment


View Entire List ›



from BuzzFeed - USNews http://ift.tt/1JfpuC4

Dustin "Screech" Diamond Found Guilty Of Misdemeanor In Bar Stabbing

Daniel Boczarski / Getty Images

A Wisconsin jury found former Saved By The Bell actor Dustin Diamond not guilty of one felony charge but found him guilty of two misdemeanor charges in a December 2014 stabbing, according to CNN.

The actor, known as “Screech” in the 1990s television series is facing prison time with one charge carrying a maximum sentence of nine months in prison and the other a 90 day maximum sentence, according to CBS Minnesota.

The court ruled that Diamond did not recklessly endanger safety, but that he carried a concealed weapon and behaved in a disorderly manner, according to CNN.

On Christmas day last year, Diamond and his girlfriend Amanda Schutz – who live in Port Washington – were out at several bars when a fight broke out between them, two men, and a woman.

According to CBS, Diamond said that the fight broke out after some people asked him to pose for a photo and others started badgering the former child actor and his girlfriend.

“I felt like we were being set up for antagonistic purposes,” Diamond said.

A man was stabbed under the armpit during the brawl, but the injury was not life threatening. Diamond claimed he had a “pen” during the fight, but police later found a switchblade in his car, which was allegedly covered in blood.

LINK: Dustin “Screech” Diamond Charged With Stabbing A Man On Christmas Day



from BuzzFeed - USNews http://ift.tt/1dGyao1